Seattle Software Agency SeattleSoftware Agency

Database Scaling Guide for Growing Applications

Your database is the foundation of your application. Here's how to keep it fast as your data grows.

Most applications don't have a scaling problem — they have a database problem. The application server scales horizontally by adding more instances. The database doesn't. When your application slows down, the culprit is almost always the database: slow queries, missing indexes, or a schema that wasn't designed for your current data volume.

This guide covers practical database scaling strategies in the order you should apply them: optimization first, caching second, read replicas third, and migration/sharding only when absolutely necessary. Most applications never need to go beyond step two.

Step 1: Query Optimization (Free Performance)

Before you throw hardware at the problem, optimize your queries. Most database slowdowns are caused by a handful of expensive queries that scan entire tables instead of using indexes. Run EXPLAIN ANALYZE on your slow queries and look for sequential scans on large tables.

Common fixes: add missing indexes (especially on foreign keys and frequently-filtered columns), rewrite N+1 queries (the "select all users, then select each user's orders individually" pattern), and avoid SELECT * in favor of selecting only the columns you need.

PostgreSQL's pg_stat_statements extension shows you which queries consume the most time. Start there. In our experience, optimizing the top 5 slowest queries typically reduces overall database load by 50-70%.

📊

Add Missing Indexes

Index foreign keys, WHERE clause columns, and JOIN conditions. A single index can turn a 30-second query into a 30-millisecond query.

🔍

Fix N+1 Queries

Use JOINs or batch loading (DataLoader pattern) instead of querying inside loops. This is the single most common performance bug in web applications.

📋

Select Specific Columns

SELECT only the columns you need. Fetching entire rows when you only need 3 fields wastes I/O and memory.

📈

Use EXPLAIN ANALYZE

Understand how PostgreSQL executes your queries. Look for sequential scans, high row estimates, and inefficient joins.

Step 2: Caching (The Biggest Win)

Caching is the highest-impact scaling strategy for most applications. If the same data is read 100 times for every write, you can serve 99% of reads from cache instead of hitting the database.

Redis is the standard caching layer. Cache expensive query results with a TTL (time-to-live) that matches your data freshness requirements. For real-time data, use short TTLs (30 seconds to 5 minutes). For reference data, use longer TTLs (hours to days).

Cache invalidation is the hard part. The simplest approach: write-through caching (update the cache whenever you update the database). For complex scenarios, use event-driven invalidation or accept eventual consistency with short TTLs.

Step 3: Read Replicas

When your read volume exceeds what a single database can handle (even with caching), add read replicas. The primary database handles writes, replicas handle reads. Most applications are read-heavy (90%+ reads), so this can multiply your capacity by 3-5x.

PostgreSQL streaming replication creates near-real-time replicas (usually less than 1 second behind). Route read queries to replicas and write queries to the primary. Be aware of replication lag — if a user writes data and immediately reads it, they should read from the primary to avoid stale data.

Step 4: When to Consider Database Migration

You should only consider database migration or sharding after exhausting optimization, caching, and read replicas. Most applications serving millions of users never need to go beyond step 3.

If you do need to go further: vertical scaling (bigger machine) is simpler than horizontal scaling (sharding). PostgreSQL can handle databases in the hundreds of gigabytes to low terabytes on a single well-configured machine. Only consider sharding when you've outgrown the biggest available instance.

If your application has fundamentally different data access patterns (e.g., high-volume time-series data alongside relational data), consider using specialized databases for specific workloads (e.g., TimescaleDB for time-series) rather than making your primary database handle everything.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I know if my database is the bottleneck?
Check your application's response time breakdown. If most of the time is spent in database queries (visible in APM tools like Datadog, New Relic, or even simple request timing logs), the database is the bottleneck. Also check database CPU and I/O metrics — sustained high utilization indicates capacity limits.
When should we move from SQLite to PostgreSQL?
Immediately in production. SQLite is excellent for development and testing but doesn't handle concurrent writes well. Move to PostgreSQL before your first production deployment. The migration is straightforward and PostgreSQL will serve you well from 0 to millions of users.
Is MongoDB better for scaling?
MongoDB is not inherently better at scaling than PostgreSQL. MongoDB's built-in sharding is simpler to configure, but PostgreSQL with proper optimization, caching, and read replicas handles the majority of production workloads. Choose based on your data model needs, not scaling assumptions.
How much does database scaling cost?
Query optimization and caching are essentially free (development time only). Read replicas roughly double your database hosting cost. For most applications on AWS/GCP, a well-optimized PostgreSQL setup costs $200-500/month and handles millions of requests per day.

Database Performance Problems?

We specialize in diagnosing and fixing database performance issues. Book a free consultation and we'll review your database architecture.

Call Now Book a Call